EVENT LOG FOR SITE MC1 The first line of each entry contains a date/time stamp & who is reporting. The most recent entry is listed first. Date Time Who ---------- ----- -------- 12/29/2006 10:59 Don_Warf Per Pete Peterson: These sites are unreachable due to a MCI cable cut. Crews have been dispatched. Estimated to be repaired later today. -----Original Message----- From: pittag@psmfc.org [mailto:pittag@psmfc.org] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 9:15 AM To: ptoc_ken@psmfc.org Subject: Problems with remote data sites... The following problems with remote sites were detected; mcj: Last data submission was received on Fri Dec 29 6:04:56 PST 2006 grj: Last data submission was received on Fri Dec 29 6:03:18 PST 2006 mc1: Last data submission was received on Fri Dec 29 6:02:47 PST 2006 Please check this out. 12/21/2006 23:24 Dave I updated the obs_site_dates table to reflect the end of operations for the year, and updated etc/sites to constrain the notification distribution to the Kennewick field staff. 12/21/2006 15:32 Alan_Bro The Washington shore fish pumps were turned off 12/19/2006, the ladder was brought to orifice flow 12/20/2006 and is being de-watered today, 12/21/2006. As soon as the bulkheads can be verified and human access to the ladder granted, remaining fish will be chased out. The ladder is expected to remain de-watered through the week of 1/15/2007. 12/21/2006 08:05 alan@ree 03:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: This site is reportedly being de-watered today. PTAGIS Field Operations will post official times as soon as they are known. 12/20/2006 07:23 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 12/19/2006 07:25 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 12/15/2006 07:21 troy@ree 01:Overrun,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be looked into on the next site visit. 12/12/2006 07:17 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 12/10/2006 08:59 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 12/10/2006 08:58 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 12/09/2006 08:03 darren@r 03:LowExcCurrent,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: The alarm on antenna 03 was probably caused by PSMFC personnel while performing a site GMC. The alarms on antenna 0B have been well documented. 12/07/2006 08:03 troy@ree 03:LowExcCurrent,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms were most likely the result of a GMC. PSMFC will monitor for future problems. 12/06/2006 14:32 Alan A GMC was performed 12/6/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The clocks on both PCs were set to within one second of atomic time, no problems found. 12/06/2006 07:45 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm Noted. 12/05/2006 07:25 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 12/04/2006 07:31 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 12/03/2006 10:12 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 12/02/2006 11:10 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 12/01/2006 07:45 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 11/30/2006 10:15 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 11/30/2006 10:12 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/29/2006 07:26 troy@ree 03:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 11/28/2006 07:38 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 11/27/2006 07:24 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/26/2006 09:53 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/25/2006 10:29 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/24/2006 07:14 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/23/2006 07:02 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/21/2006 08:38 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/20/2006 07:32 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/18/2006 08:32 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 11/16/2006 07:37 darren@r 07:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms have been noted. 11/15/2006 07:16 Alan_Bro Site has been verified online, will monitor for 9:00 load. -----Original Message----- From: pittag@psmfc.org [mailto:pittag@psmfc.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:15 AM To: sitemaint@psmfc.org Subject: Problems with remote data sites... The following problems with remote sites were detected; mc1: Last data submission was received on Wed Nov 15 3:02:30 PST 2006 Please check this out. 11/15/2006 07:15 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 11/14/2006 07:36 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Problem well documented. 11/13/2006 07:31 darren@r 07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Detection systems 07 and 08 will be addressed on the next site visit. Detection system 0B will be addressed during the de-watrering period. 11/11/2006 10:46 scottl Sites did not load at the 0900 interval. Will check sites again at the 1300 interval. 11/11/2006 10:43 scottl@r 07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Errors noted. 11/09/2006 07:28 darren@r 07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms are being cleared for future monitoring. 11/05/2006 08:29 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/04/2006 07:59 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/03/2006 07:55 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 11/02/2006 08:44 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 11/02/2006 08:44 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:LowExcCurrent: These alarms were generated during a site GMC. 10/31/2006 15:39 Alan A GMC was performed 10/31/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary, no problems found. 10/31/2006 07:55 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/30/2006 07:36 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/29/2006 09:08 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/28/2006 08:16 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem clearing TASS. 10/27/2006 08:45 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS. 10/26/2006 07:28 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: This is a known problem. 10/25/2006 08:08 Alan_Bro This is being reposted as the original posting yesterday didn't make it to the event logs: All primary data collection computers auto upload functions were re-engaged at 12:43 PST. Delinquent files were not manually pushed to PTAGIS. The uploader will submit files in the next 3 hrs. 10/25/2006 07:33 troy@ruf 07:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: noted 10/24/2006 09:45 Alan_Bro Automated file loading has been disabled. 10/23/2006 07:43 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/20/2006 07:11 scottl@r 0A:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/20/2006 07:11 scottl@r 08:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/20/2006 07:11 scottl@r 07:TestTagFailure: Noted 10/18/2006 07:20 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/17/2006 08:00 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/16/2006 07:46 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/15/2006 08:01 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/14/2006 08:41 darren@r 07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. We will be addressing the alarms on 0A, 07, and 08. The alarms on 0B have been well documented. 10/11/2006 07:34 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/10/2006 07:23 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: This detection system has been well documented. The detection system will be checked out after the ladder is de-watered. 10/10/2006 07:22 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure: This detection system will be addressed on the next site visit. 10/08/2006 10:56 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 10/07/2006 09:21 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 10/06/2006 07:48 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Known problems, clearing TASS. 10/05/2006 07:26 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Known problems, clearing TASS 10/04/2006 16:20 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 10/03/2006 08:08 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: This problem has been well documented. 10/02/2006 07:37 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: PSMFC will investigate the alarms on antenna 0A on the next site visit. The alarms on 0B have been well documented. 10/01/2006 07:57 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure: The hit rate will be adjusted on the next site visit. This transceiver is reading PIT Tags with high efficiency. 10/01/2006 07:54 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/30/2006 08:56 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure: No apparent reason for these alarms. This transceiver is reading PIT Tags with high efficiency. PTAGIS Field Operations will investigate on the next site visit. 09/30/2006 08:54 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/27/2006 07:26 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/26/2006 08:27 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/26/2006 08:26 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure: The hit rate will be adjusted on the next site visit. 09/25/2006 08:20 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/25/2006 08:20 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure: No apparent reason for this alarm. This transceiver is reading PIT Tags with high efficiency. PTAGIS Field Operations will investigate on the next site visit. 09/24/2006 10:11 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 09/23/2006 11:06 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure,0E:TestTagFailure: These are known issues, clearing TASS. 09/22/2006 07:21 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem, clearing TASS 09/21/2006 08:22 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem clearing TASS 09/20/2006 07:45 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 09/18/2006 08:06 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Known problems, clearing TASS 09/16/2006 08:20 alan@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure: No apparent reason for this alarm. This transceiver is reading PIT Tags with high efficiency. PTAGIS Field Operations will investigate on the next site visit. 09/16/2006 08:16 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/11/2006 08:31 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/10/2006 07:35 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 09/09/2006 08:15 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 09/08/2006 11:54 Darren A site GMC was performed today (9-8-06). All transceivers were checked fro tuning, noise and detection ability. There appears to be some noise on antenna 01 that could not be tuned out and upon furhter investigation I found that the water level through the counting window is high in comparison to normal operations, this coud be causing some vibrations on the surrounding structure thus causing noise on 01. No other problems were found. 09/08/2006 07:23 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: The alarms on detection system 0B has been well noted. The alarm on detection system 0A will be investigated during the site GMC today. 09/06/2006 07:54 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 09/05/2006 08:04 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 09/04/2006 08:05 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/03/2006 08:54 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 09/02/2006 08:10 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/31/2006 07:32 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/30/2006 08:03 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/29/2006 07:49 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/28/2006 07:56 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/25/2006 08:44 dlwarf@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem. 08/24/2006 08:04 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. 08/23/2006 07:33 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/22/2006 07:26 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm has been noted and the detection system well documented. 08/21/2006 07:56 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Alarm noted. This detection system has been well documented this season. 08/18/2006 11:35 dlwarf@r 09:HighTemp,0B:TestTagFailure: OB is unrepairable until waterdown. 08/14/2006 15:37 Alan A GMC was performed 8/14/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The clocks on both PCs were set to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 08/13/2006 08:41 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 08/12/2006 10:18 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/10/2006 07:57 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/09/2006 07:50 Darren_C I manually pushed the 03:00 thru 06:00 files for these site via PCA. Darren R. Chase PSMFC Systems Engineer (509) 735-2773 ext.3 darren@psmfc.org 08/09/2006 07:50 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/08/2006 08:14 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/07/2006 07:49 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/06/2006 09:10 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/05/2006 19:27 Troy These files were pushed. I will wait until the am to see if this is really a problem or not. The following problems with remote sites were detected; grj: Last data submission was received on Sat Aug 5 15:14:10 PST 2006 mc1: Last data submission was received on Sat Aug 5 15:11:27 PST 2006 goj: Last data submission was received on Sat Aug 5 15:08:52 PST 2006 Please check this out. 08/05/2006 18:55 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 08/04/2006 08:32 dlwarf@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem. 08/03/2006 07:24 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: This problem has been well documented. 08/02/2006 08:40 darren@r 01:LowExcCurrent,01:TestTagFailure,02:BadOscFreq,02:LowExcCurrent,05:LowEx cCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: A site GMC was performed yesterday and some of these alarms may have been generated by PSMFC personnel. The alarms on detection system 0B have been well documented. 08/01/2006 10:51 Troy A site GMC was perform 8/1/06. All transceivers were checked for tune and adjustments made where needed. 01 is in the low teens and the noise can not be tuned out. The connection at the antenna was checked and no problems found. The water flow looks normal as well. PSMFC will continue to watch this. The antenna is reading PIT Tags well. OB is at .1 amp due to a failed antenna below the water line. OF is at 100% due to a pittag in the field. No other problems to report. 08/01/2006 07:19 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Detection system has been well documented. 07/31/2006 07:49 darren@r 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms have been noted and will be addressed on the next site visit. 07/27/2006 07:30 troy@ree 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms have been well documented. 07/26/2006 10:31 troy@ruf 0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0F:LowExcCurrent: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 07/25/2006 10:15 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure,0F:LowExcCurrent: These alarms are well documented. 07/25/2006 08:08 scottl@r 03:HighTemp,05:HighTemp,0A:HighTemp,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0F :LowExcCurrent: High temp alarms are due to excessive daytime temperatures, antenna 0F still has a PIT tag stuck in the field. Will PCA into site and adjust the current thresholds for 0F in order to avoid false alarms 07/24/2006 08:02 scottl@r 03:HighTemp,04:HighTemp,05:HighTemp,07:HighTemp,08:HighTemp,0A:HighTemp,0A :TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0F:LowExcCurrent,11:HighTemp,12:HighTemp : Alarms are to be expected due to extreme temperatures. 07/20/2006 07:41 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Detection system has been well documented. 07/19/2006 09:05 darren@r 09:HighTemp,0B:TestTagFailure: The high temp alarm is to be expected during this time of year. The detection system 0B has been well documented by PSMFC. 07/18/2006 11:09 Dave Re-activated auto-upload on PC1 and transferred all outstanding files. Archived all outstanding files on PC2. PC clocks are within 1 second of each other and 50 seconds of atomic time. 07/17/2006 15:10 Alan_Bro The auto upload process was disengaged until further notice due to the scheduled outage of the central database. The sites will not upload files until possibly Monday the 17th or 18th or when the central database resumes normal operations.. 07/17/2006 15:09 PTOC_Bot The auto upload process was disengaged until further notice due to the scheduled outage of the central database. The sites will not upload files until possibly Monday the 17th or 18th or when the central database resumes normal operations.. 07/14/2006 09:11 alan@ruf 01:LowExcCurrent,01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:T estTagFailure,0C:LowExcCurrent,0D:LowExcCurrent: These alarms was generated by PTAGIS Field Operations personnel during a site visit. 07/13/2006 07:59 alan@ruf 02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent: These alarms will be addressed today during a site visit. 07/12/2006 09:36 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent,0F:LowExcCurrent: The alarms on detection systems 0B and 0F are well documented. The current alarm on antenna 0D wil be addressed via PCA today. 07/11/2006 16:53 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,02:LowExcCurrent,02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B: TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent,0F:LowExcCurrent: These alarms are being cleared. Some where generated prior to a site GMC and some during. PSMFC will check in the am and be back at the site to try and determine if some of these alarms are heat related as the noise levels seem to be elevated site wide. 07/11/2006 16:37 Troy A site GMC was performed 07/11/06. All transceivers were checked for tune and adjustments made where needed. 0D and 0E are at signal levels between 10%-30%. I could not tune out the noise. I suspect there is a problem below the water line. 0F is still at 100% noise due to a pittag in the field and 0B is still dead. Both antenna's at the counting window were noisy. I was able to tune 02 down to acceptable level. 01's signal level was tune down to 9%-12% but could not tune it lower. Both are reading well. No other problems to report. 07/10/2006 08:42 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These antenna's are reading pittags. The alarms will be looked into during a site visit 7/13/2006. 07/09/2006 11:25 troy@ruf 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 07/08/2006 10:15 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D :LowExcCurrent: These antenna's are reading pittags. The alarms will be looked into on the next site visit. 07/07/2006 16:55 Scott_Li The problem with the COE DNS server has been corrected. PCA'd into sites and returned the URL in the uploader back to the default. Sent diagnostic test PTAGIS server to check for typo's, tested good. 07/06/2006 12:41 scottl Due to an unknown DNS look up problem appearently at the COE distict, not confirmed but suspected, the uploader client URL was changed from FTP.PTAGIS.ORG to the I/P address in order to circumvent the above issue. The data collection pc's will stay in this configuration until the issue is resolved. Will follow up with COE-NWP CIS help desk for resolution. 07/06/2006 07:49 scottl@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent: Raw dat files indicate excessive noise levels as the cause of most alarms, Will investigate today and retune and calibrate if necessary 07/05/2006 07:13 scottl@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent: Will address the alarms on the next site visit 07/04/2006 08:36 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent: These alarms will be checked this week during site visits. The detection system 0B has been well documented for it's failures. 07/03/2006 08:02 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: The detection systems 02 and 0A will be addressed during the next site visit. The alarms on detection system 0B have been well documented. 07/02/2006 08:59 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 06/29/2006 07:40 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: The test tag failures on detection system 02 may be caused by PITtags that are not quite in the field. The status reports do not indicate any reason for the failures. The failures on detection system 0A have no direct cause the status reports do not indicate any reason for the failures. 0B has been well documented. 06/28/2006 07:35 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: The status reports for antennas 02 and 0A do not indicate an increase in noise. The timer tags have fired on their scheduled intervals. We will monitor these systems and address them on the next site visit. 06/27/2006 07:55 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure,0C: LowExcCurrent,0C:TestTagFailure: A site GMC was performed yesterday. All the transceivers were tuned and checked for noise. 06/26/2006 12:04 scottl Ammendum to the last pit event, Antenna 0B is inoperable and only has 0.1 amps of drive current and cannot be tuned. Cross verified the bad antenna with 0C transciever to ensure the 0B transceiver was operable. 06/26/2006 11:25 scottl Performed site GMC, all transceivers were checked for tune and calibration, no problems to report. Restore the AboutTime application on PC1 and synchronized the two data collection computers. System clocks are within 48 seconds of atomic time and 0 sec. from each other. 06/24/2006 10:56 scottl@r 02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: antenna 0B has known problems, TT failures are to be expected 06/19/2006 12:58 Darren A site GMC was performed today (6-19-06). All transceivers were checked for tuning, noise and detection ability. With the exception of antenna 0B (shorted) and 0F (tag in the field) no problems were found. The PC clocks were adjusted to within 1 second of atomic time and 1 seconds of each other. 06/19/2006 08:39 scottl@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem with antenna, TT failures are expected. 06/17/2006 10:31 troy@ree 01:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: OB is known to have problems. 01 will be monitored for future TT failures. 06/15/2006 13:13 Darren A site GMC was performed today (6-15-06). All transceivers were checked for tuning, noise, and detection ability. The PC clocks are within 40 seconds of atomic time and 1 seconds of each other. With the exception of antennas 0B and 0F no problems were found. 06/12/2006 07:53 troy@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 06/11/2006 09:12 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 06/10/2006 09:18 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 06/09/2006 08:14 alan@ree 02:TestTagFailure: This alarm occurred: 2006/06/08 16:06:50 06/09/2006 07:57 alan@ree 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 06/08/2006 07:41 alan@ree 02:TestTagFailure: This alarm appears to have been caused by a momentary noise event. PTAGIS Field Operations will continue to monitor. 06/08/2006 07:38 alan@ree 05:BadExcFreq,05:BadOscFreq,05:LowExcCurrent,07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagF ailure,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure,0C:TestTagFailure,0D:TestTagFail ure: These alarms were generated by PTAGIS Field Operations during a site visit. 06/07/2006 10:37 Darren A site GMC was performed today (6-7-06). All the transceivers were checked for tuning, noise, and detecton ability. I had to adjust all the timer tag potentiometers to obtain 100% hit rates with the doors closed. these were diminished for testing purposes and were not restored causing the timer tags to fail occassionally. The PC clocks are within 30 seconds of atomic time and equal to each other. 06/07/2006 08:26 alan@ree 02:TestTagFailure,07:TestTagFailure,08:TestTagFailure,0A:TestTagFailure,0B :TestTagFailure: Alarms will be investigated today during a GMC. 06/06/2006 08:31 troy@ree 07:TestTagFailure,09:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 06/02/2006 08:50 dlwarf@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,09:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 06/01/2006 07:34 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,05:BadExcFreq,05:BadOscFreq,05:LowExcC urrent,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent,11:LowExcCurrent: With the exception of antennas 01 and 02 these alarms were generated by PSMFC personnel. The test tag failures on 0B have been well documented. 05/31/2006 07:48 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms will be checked today during site GMC. 05/30/2006 08:06 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure,0C:HighTemp: The alarms will be addressed with the exception of the detection system 0B which had been well documented over the past season during the next site GMC. 05/25/2006 07:42 scottl@r 01:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/23/2006 12:54 Alan A GMC was performed 5/23/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The PCs clocks were adjusted to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 05/23/2006 08:40 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/22/2006 09:17 Dave The likely explanation for why antenna "0F" is not reading timer tags is that tag 3D9.1BF2294BCA is probably still lodged in a crack within the antenna field. We've detected this tag over 4.125M times since May 6, even after Scott turned unique OFF on this transceiver on May 8. The most recent detection of this tag was on May 20. 05/22/2006 07:38 scottl@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/22/2006 07:05 scottl@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/21/2006 09:54 Troy OF is not detecting TT but is reading fish. This will be looked into on the next site visit. 05/20/2006 09:39 troy@ruf 02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/19/2006 07:32 troy@ruf 02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: OB is known to have problems. O2 will be looked into on the next site visit. 05/18/2006 16:40 Scott_Li Last PIT event was for MC2, This site should not be affected by the power outage. 05/18/2006 16:34 Scott_Li Brad Eby called to inform us that there will be a power outage sometime Monday Morning to replace a transformer that was incorrectly installed by the contractor. Brad did not know what time this was to happen but speculated in the AM. Unclear as to the duration of the outage, will follow up tomorrow and get more particulars. 05/18/2006 08:32 troy@ruf 02:TestTagFailure: This will be addressed on the next site visit. 05/18/2006 08:05 scottl@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Known problem antenna, Not of concern at this time 05/17/2006 08:00 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: OB is known to have problems. 01 and 02 will be monitored for future test tag failures. 05/16/2006 11:21 Alan A GMC was performed 5/16/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The PCs clocks were adjusted to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 05/14/2006 10:30 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/13/2006 11:50 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be investigated during a site visit next week. 05/10/2006 07:29 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/08/2006 13:05 Darren A site GMC was performed today (5-8-06). All transceivers were checked for tuning, noise and detection ability. No problems were found. The Pc clocks are within 10 seconds of atomic time and 1 second of each other. 05/08/2006 08:03 Scott_Li It appears that a PIT tag is stuck in the field of antenna 0F. Turned Reader Unique from OFF to ON in order to keep data file sizes to a minimum until this tag finds its way out. 05/07/2006 10:11 Darren_C I discovered that there appears to be a tag that has lodged in the field of this antenna. The tag code 3D9.1BF2294BCA is generating files in excess of 15M PSMFC will discuss the situation on Monday and will decide whether or not to place this system in "Standby" or let it run until the tag is evacuated from this antenna. 05/06/2006 09:11 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure: Alarm will be investigated on the next site visit. 05/05/2006 08:04 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 05/04/2006 08:59 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms will be investigated on the next site visit. 05/02/2006 12:38 Alan A GMC was performed 4/26/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. PC2 was set to generate a new file every hour. The PCs clocks were adjusted to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 05/02/2006 08:33 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/30/2006 11:18 scottl@r 02:TestTagFailure,06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These problems will be addressed on the next scheduled site visit if not sooner 04/27/2006 09:57 scottl@r 0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Testtag failure is due to a faulty antenna and is a known on-going problem 04/26/2006 14:51 Alan A GMC was performed 4/26/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The clocks on both PCs were set to within one second of atomic time. A Rip-Tie was installed to hold the door open on transceiver 09 to allow better ventilation. No other problems found. 04/25/2006 08:54 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: This alarm is on going alarm and is being cleared as a test of outlook. 04/22/2006 11:11 Don_Warf All WW District sites now back on-line. Source of outage unknown. -----Original Message----- From: pittag@psmfc.org [mailto:pittag@psmfc.org] Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 10:34 AM To: pitevent-list@psmfc.org Subject: pitevent for site(s) ICH GOJ MCJ GRA GRJ MC2 LMJ MC1 For site(s) ICH GOJ MCJ GRA GRJ MC2 LMJ MC1, Don_Warf (Posted via mail from "Don Warf" ) sends the following PITTAG event: I am currently investigating why all COE Walla Walla District sites did not load. ----Original Message----- From: pittag@psmfc.org [mailto:pittag@psmfc.org] Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 10:15 AM To: sitemaint@psmfc.org Subject: Problems with remote data sites... The following problems with remote sites were detected; ich: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:00:57 PST 2006 goj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:30 PST 2006 mcj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:26 PST 2006 gra: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:03:03 PST 2006 grj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:21 PST 2006 mc2: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:03:18 PST 2006 lmj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:35 PST 2006 mc1: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:40 PST 2006 Please check this out. 04/22/2006 11:04 dlwarf@r 09:HighTemp,0B:TestTagFailure: High temp alarm on 09 is of concern since air temp is only 65F. 04/22/2006 10:34 Don_Warf I am currently investigating why all COE Walla Walla District sites did not load. ----Original Message----- From: pittag@psmfc.org [mailto:pittag@psmfc.org] Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 10:15 AM To: sitemaint@psmfc.org Subject: Problems with remote data sites... The following problems with remote sites were detected; ich: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:00:57 PST 2006 goj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:30 PST 2006 mcj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:26 PST 2006 gra: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:03:03 PST 2006 grj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:21 PST 2006 mc2: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:03:18 PST 2006 lmj: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:35 PST 2006 mc1: Last data submission was received on Sat Apr 22 6:02:40 PST 2006 Please check this out. 04/20/2006 08:09 alan@ruf 0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/18/2006 12:41 Darren A site GMC was performed today (4-18-06). All the transceivers were checked for tuning, noise, and detectability with the exception of antenna 0B no problems were found. 04/16/2006 11:28 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/15/2006 09:23 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: This antenna is known to have issues 04/12/2006 08:12 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Detection system has been documented. 04/11/2006 08:10 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Problem has been documented. we will continue to monitor. 04/10/2006 12:11 Darren A site GMC was performed today (4-10-06). All transceivers were checked for tuning and noise. No problems were found, with the exception of antenna 0B at MC1 which has been well documented in the event logs, the Data Collection Platforms were within 20 seconds of atomic time and one second of each other. 04/10/2006 08:19 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: This detection system has failed to the point of being unable to drive the antenna. This happened right after the ladder was watered up for the season everything indicates that the problem is below the water. We will investigate during the next down time. 04/09/2006 09:09 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/08/2006 09:17 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/07/2006 08:46 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/07/2006 08:45 alan@ruf 06:LowExcCurrent: This transceiver is delivering ~3.3A. Lowered the threshold from 3000 to 2800 via PCA. PTAGIS Field Operations will continue to monitor. 04/06/2006 09:10 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/05/2006 08:50 alan@ruf 0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/04/2006 13:17 Alan A GMC was performed 4/4/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. The clocks on both PCs were set to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 04/04/2006 09:06 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 04/03/2006 08:51 alan@ruf 06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on Tuesday during a site GMC. 04/02/2006 09:11 darren@r 06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on Tuesday during a site GMC. 04/01/2006 08:54 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:TestTagFailure,06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: PSMFC will be on site Tuesday for site GMC's at MCJ and MC1. We will address these alarms at that time. 03/29/2006 08:58 darren@r 06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Site will be visited for a site GMC this week. 03/28/2006 08:20 darren@r 02:TestTagFailure,06:LowExcCurrent,08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 03/25/2006 09:46 scottl@r 06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Not of concern at this time. 03/24/2006 08:50 scottl@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:LowExcCurrent,02:TestTagFailure,03:LowExcCurrent,04:L owExcCurrent,09:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent,0F:LowExc Current: Any problems will address on the next site visit. 03/23/2006 08:48 darren@r 06:LowExcCurrent,09:HighTemp,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be investigated on the next site visit. The failures on antenna 0B are due to the fact that the antenna has completely shorted and we are currently unable to drive this antenna with a substantial current. PSMFC is aware of this and will address this antenna when the time is available. 03/22/2006 09:00 darren@r 0B:TestTagFailure: PSMFC will address this alarm tomorrow (3-23-06) while PSMFC is on site working on the counting window installation at MC2. 03/21/2006 11:43 scottl@r 06:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: These errors will corrected on the next site visit. 03/19/2006 10:18 dlwarf@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:LowExcCurrent,02:TestTagFailure,03:LowExcCurrent,04:L owExcCurrent,09:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure,0D:LowExcCurrent,0F:LowExc Current: Site to be visited tomorrow for a GMC. 03/13/2006 08:05 troy@ruf 08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 03/12/2006 09:37 troy@ruf 08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: See previous acknowledgement 03/11/2006 08:18 troy@ruf 08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: OB is suspected to be failed below the water line. 08 may be a bad VTT or is in need of tune. This will be addressed on the next site visit. 03/10/2006 08:10 troy@ruf 08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: These alarms will be addressed on the next site visit. 03/09/2006 08:49 troy@ruf 08:TestTagFailure,0B:TestTagFailure: 08 will be investigated on the next site visit.0B appears to be a failed antenna. 03/06/2006 08:10 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 03/05/2006 06:55 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 03/04/2006 12:33 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 03/03/2006 08:27 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted 03/01/2006 08:12 dlwarf@r 0B:TestTagFailure: This might be a failed antenna. 02/28/2006 08:12 dlwarf@r 0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 02/27/2006 11:18 alan@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: This antenna is having a problem below the water line. PTAGIS Field Operations will investigate at the next opportunity. 02/26/2006 08:14 dlwarf@r 01:TestTagFailure,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: Alarms to be addressed on the next GMC. 02/24/2006 15:03 Alan A GMC was performed 2/24/2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. Antenna 0B is confirmed bad with a problem below the waterline, most likely a leak. Transceiver 0B is currently able to drive the antenna at 0.6A. It will be left as is in case the antenna becomes useable again. The clocks on both PCs were set to within one second of atomic time. No other problems found. 02/24/2006 08:33 troy@ruf 0B:TestTagFailure: This transciever appears to have noise problems. It will be addressed on the next site visit. 02/20/2006 09:35 dlwarf@r 01:TestTagFailure,0B:BadExcFreq,0B:TestTagFailure: Noted. 02/19/2006 09:56 dlwarf@r 0B:BadExcFreq,0B:BadOscFreq,0B:LowExcCurrent,0B:TestTagFailure: To be addressed on the next GMC. 02/17/2006 08:02 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: Noted 02/14/2006 14:21 Troy The power supply for PC2 was replaced and the machine re-installed today. 02/14/2006 08:42 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: This alarm will be looked into today. 02/13/2006 08:37 scottl@r 01:TestTagFailure: Noted, not of concern at this time. 02/11/2006 11:45 dlwarf@r 01:TestTagFailure: Noted. 02/10/2006 12:38 Alan A GMC was performed 2-10-2006. All transceivers were checked and tuned as necessary. PC2 is out of service with suspected power supply problems. It will be repaired and returned to service ASAP. No other problems found. 02/08/2006 08:31 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure: Alarm will be addressed on the next site visit. 02/04/2006 08:55 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: Noted 01/31/2006 08:10 troy@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: PSMFC will monitor for future occurances 01/25/2006 08:05 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: This alarm will be addressed on the next site visit. 01/24/2006 08:12 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: This alarm will be addressed on the next site visit. 01/23/2006 08:17 alan@ruf 01:TestTagFailure: This alarm will be addressed on the next site visit. 01/21/2006 23:51 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure: Alarm will be addressed on the next site visit. 01/20/2006 08:33 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure,02:LowExcCurrent,08:TestTagFailure: The ladder water level was adjusted yesterday form full flow to orifice and back to full flow. These alarms could be a result from the level change. PSMFC will be on site for a GMC next week and all transceivers will be tuned and reset for the 06 season. 01/18/2006 08:35 darren@r 02:LowExcCurrent,08:TestTagFailure: Ladder is at orifice flow and will remain in this state until 1-19-06. PSMFC will verify the state of the ladder on 1-19-06. 01/13/2006 08:38 darren@r 02:LowExcCurrent,03:LowExcCurrent,06:LowExcCurrent,09:LowExcCurrent,0D:Low ExcCurrent,0D:Overrun: The ladder is currently at an orifice flow as confirmed by Brad Eby site biologist. I spoke with him today 1-13-06 and this informatoin was passed on to me. This happened around 09:00 yesterday 1-12-06. 01/10/2006 08:39 darren@r 02:LowExcCurrent,03:LowExcCurrent,04:LowExcCurrent,06:LowExcCurrent,07:Low ExcCurrent,08:LowExcCurrent,09:LowExcCurrent,0A:LowExcCurrent,0C:LowExcCur rent,0D:LowExcCurrent,0F:LowExcCurrent,12:LowExcCurrent: These alarms were generated because of the ladder de-watering yesterday starting around 08:00. I have confirmed this schedule with Brad Eby site biologist. The ladder will be out of service approximately 2 weeks. 01/09/2006 08:18 darren@r 01:TestTagFailure: The noise is slightly elevated and this could be the cause of the failure. The ladder is scheduled to be de-watered today and PSMFC will verify this action and post an event. 01/01/2006 12:40 PTOC_Bot Annual log file initiation for MC1 #### End of Event Log for MC1 ###