MCNARY JUVENILE FISH FACILITY EVENTS Date Event 11/02.93 Shut down site for the season, Removed all the Pit Tag gear (including the computers) for testing at the BIOMARK lab in Boise. (Warf) 10/07/93 Visited for maint. Everything checks ok, (Warf) 07/29/93 Visited for maint check. Everything checks ok. (Warf) 07/13/93 Visited for maint check. Everything looks ok. (Warf) 04/14/93 17:05 Brad Eby reports McNary Juvenile watered-up. pcs 04/16/93 Determined that two tuners are bad on coils 68 and 6A (A Main). (R Buchanan) 04/22/93 Replaced tuners on 68 and 6A. (R Buchanan, w/Don and John Govig) 05/05/93 Attempted install timer tags; tags defective. (R Buchanan, per Don) 05/07/93 Time on controllers screwed up; repaired itself (MONITOR.EXE function). Will need to look at files to repair date/time on records. (R Buchanan) 05/10/93 Not able to upload yesterday's data; busy signal on line. Brad Eby not able to clear line locally. (R Buchanan) 05/12/93 Phone line was somehow hung on modem; turned PC off with phone attached to that modem, clearing problem. Moved phone to other PC afterwards. (R Buchanan) 05/17/93 Coils 70, 72 (A Sub) observed to be at extremely low efficiency. Don will investigate tomorrow. (R Buchanan) 05/18/93 Coils appear to be operating reasonably well; however, water in tunnel backs up quickly to form a pool that completely fills the chamber. This changes the resonant frequency of the coil, reducing the efficinency. NMFS personnel will be here tomorrow to investigate further. (R Buchanan, per Don) 05/19/93 Don and John Govig (NMFS) worked for several hours on coils; did not have any effect on tune. Water is not at a medium depth for long enough to work with (either dry or full except for around 10 seconds while filling and draining). Solution will involve changing the plumbing or the timing. Also replaced exciter on 70 and 72 due to overheating in connec- tors. (R Buchanan, per Don) 06/08/93 Visited for maintenance check; computers, other equipment OK; ran test tags on A Main, A Sub, B Main; 10/10 on all four coils of A Main, B Main; 10/10 on three coils of A Sub, 8/10 on coil 76. Looked at flow through B Main while sub-sample is in oper- ation; same flow condition that floods A Sub appears to affect B Main, though not as drastically (B Main is further upstream and higher in elevation by inches). We will watch coil effi- ciencies closely. (R Buchanan, Don)